Archive for the ‘Video Analysis of Contemporary Speeches’ Category

Obama’s Tucson Speech

Friday, January 14th, 2011

President Obama gives a powerful, and eloquent speech at the memorial in Tucson for the victims of Saturday’s shooting spree in Arizona.

To begin with, he has made the smart choice to work without a tele-prompter, and instead, simply read off of cards.  This allows him to make an abundance of eye contact, and to focus more readily on the ideas behind the speech.

He starts the speech with a jarring attention getter, speaking of the “sudden hole torn in our hearts”.  The image suggests a bullet wound.  It’s a bold metaphor, and a great choice for an opener.  From here, he moves into the stories of sacrifice and courage under fire that permeated the tragedy.  A great speech is always filled with personal details, and there is an abundance here; the r.v. used by two victims to travel across the country, or the fact that the youngest victim, a 9 year old girl, was a softball player, and dreamed of being the first woman in Major League Baseball.

Obama never forgets his call to action.  Every speech should have one.  Toward the conclusion of the speech, Obama states: “we know we should not use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on each other.”  It’s a profound plea for peace, made in a speech that was defined by chaos.

What do you think?  I would rate this as one of our president’s finer moments.

Personal Reveleation and Public Speaking

Monday, December 13th, 2010

How much should you reveal in a speech?  Should you put yourself on the line?  Tell something private about yourself?  In this speech, Tony Porter uses a number of deeply personal stories to drive home his point about the socialization of men.  His thesis is stated early, and is crystal clear; men are taught to hide their emotions, and disrespect women, and this needs to change.

Many speakers would resort to dry statistics in order to prove their point, but Mr. Porter makes a much shrewder choice by using deeply personal stories.  He begins with a story about his children, and his overbearing need to discipline his son because he is crying.  He moves on to a story about his father crying in a limousine after a funeral, and then a story about his first sexual experience.  Each story builds in intensity and personal revelation, and weaves effortlessly into his thesis.  The effect is very powerful.

Statistics help build a case in a speech, but they are not the lifeblood a good speech.  Good stories are at the heart of a good speech, and the more personal, the better.  Ultimately, the audience wants to connect on a human level to a speaker, and deeply felt stories help build this intimacy.

So what do you think?  Are you willing to tell a secret in a speech?

John Stewart’s Speech at The Rally for Sanity and/or Fear

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

Gotta tell you I didn’t love this one. I really wanted to. John Stewart is a brilliant satirist, and he is wonderful on television, but he makes a mistake here that John Colbert manages to avoid when he speaks, namely he uses too many platitudes (“We can have animus and not be enemies”), and too many stale metaphors (comparing the American population to cars on the freeway).

The big public speaking sin, however, is that this speech simply lacks bite.  Stewart has been hammering Fox News for years about their fear-mongering, and it was not lost on anyone that this march was a chance for Steward to really drive home his point. So what is his thesis?: “The press did not create our problems, but it’s existence makes solving them all that much harder”. Not exactly a call to action! Way to ride the fence. C’mon John why are you holding back?

The speech suffers from a desire to be too decorous and civil. Stewart doesn’t have the gumption to mention the networks, or the anchors, who are perpetuating fear, nor indict the culture that buys into the fear-mongering. Ultimately the speech turns into a gooey, sentimental, slack affair culminating in Stewart thanking the audience for being “present”. Snore.

In December of 1964, Mario Savio, a student at Berkley, gave a speech demanding that the university lift the ban of on-campus political activities, and honor the student’s right to free speech. Now here’s a speech with some bite:

What do you think? Was Steward brilliant or a bore?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is a public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City.

Colbert’s Congressional Tesimony

Sunday, September 26th, 2010

Since I seem to be big into blogging about Steven Colbert lately, I thought we would take a look at his congressional testimony from last week.  The big question batting around the internet in regard to this speech is whether the tone is appropriate or not.  Mr. Colbert was invited to speak in front of the House of Representatives in regard to illegal farm workers and the issue of immigration.  Apparently someone had the brilliant idea of sending Mr. Colbert into a field to pick fruit for a few hours, and then testify before the House of Representatives on his experience.  Of course, Mr. Colbert was completely outlandish, stayed in character, and, on occasion, mocked the very work he was presumed to defend.

From a public speaking standpoint, you could say that Colbert was tone-deaf, didn’t analyze the occasion thoroughly enough, and was inappropriate, but I think there is a larger question here begging to be asked, namely… what are these Representatives thinking!? ;)   And what is up with all the moralizing by politicians and the media regarding this speech?  What did they think would happen?  Mr. Colbert is a COMEDIAN.  Why is he being invited to weigh in and give a speech before a sovereign governmental body on a topic of monumental national importance?  It’s absurd.  Personally, I think Mr. Colbert’s speech was perfectly appropriate.  Satirists satirize.  That is what they do.  If the House of Representatives wanted an expert, they should have invited one.  They invited a satirist, and the invitee turned the whole absurdity-pie around, and launched it into the face of those deserving, the House of Representatives.

What do you think?  Bad taste or brilliant speech?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is a public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City.

Steven Colbert, Eric Schmidt and the Art of Q and A

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010
The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Eric Schmidt
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes 2010 Election Fox New

In this  Q and A segment, Steven Colbert grills Google CEO Eric Schmidt about privacy on the net in hilarious fashion.  Colbert is amazingly relaxed in front of the camera, and his one-liners are to die for, but let’s look at this Q and A from Eric Schmidt’s perspective.  How do you think he handles these questions?

I think he does a good job because he abides by a simple rule when it comes to Q and A’s; keep it simple, stupid.  There is no reason for endless answers.  Be as clear as you can, tell the truth, give you opinion, and avoid straddling the fence….you know, avoid answering questions the way most politicians do. ;)

When asked about Google in China, Schmidt’s simple answer: “We didn’t like their laws.”  When asked about a comment he made about net privacy: “It was a joke.”  This doesn’t mean that Schmidt doesn’t elaborate, he does, but he does so in a concise fashion.  It helps a good deal that he is not afraid to smile, he is reasonably in on Colbert’s joke, and he uses open gestures.

What do you think?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is a public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City.

Making a Point with a Light Touch

Friday, September 17th, 2010

Seth Godin at Gel 2006 from Gel Conference on Vimeo.

Many speeches have a serious tone…but is it possible to drive a point home with a light touch?  I think so.  Seth Goldin gives a funny, and informative speech here on the concept of “broken”.  The speech is hilarious, he uses visuals brilliantly, but what I think is most interesting is the sly way Mr. Goldin makes the listener contemplate what is “broken” and what is not.

Mr. Golden starts with a great attention getter, he has recently received a series of rebate cards, four of them to be exact, worth $30 a piece.  Of course, he can’t use any of them effectively.   He makes the choice to bring the cards on stage, and uses them as a type of prop, flipping through them as he tells his story, and then, bang, he throws them at the audience and states: “broken”.

The word “broken” is used repetitively; he riffs off of it, showing slides of ridiculous ad campaigns, and useless signage in order to make his point.  With each slide Mr. Golden gets a laugh, and then uses this laugh as cover for some more serious questions:  Why are useless ad campaigns designed?  What are the reasons for ineptitude? What is “broken” and what is not?

If I had to quible a bit with this speech, I would say that Mr. Golden apologises a bit too much.  There is never a reason to state “I am winging it” in a speech.  Luckily he has charisma to burn, and pulls this off…but I would not try it at home.

So what do you think?  Can you make a great speech, and keep it light?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is a public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in Manhattan.

The Arizona Governor Debate and Bombing

Friday, September 3rd, 2010

Ah yes, bombing.

Many of my clients asked for my two cents regarding Jan Brewer’s cringe inducing performance at the Arizona Governor Debate.  The question that came up most; was she under-prepared, or simply panicked?  As you probably noticed from the video above, Ms. Brewer stumbled badly at the top, shook her head as if to say “Gee I screwed up”, and then proceeded to piece together an incoherent summation of her turn as Governor.  Yikes.

Was she under-prepared?  Most likely, yes.  It seems as if she hadn’t really rehearsed the speech out loud much.  She seemed somewhat disorganized from the outset.  It is always important to go over a speech five to six times, ideally in front of other people, and then review bullet points silently a few times before the event, getting in touch with the essence of the speech.  Doing progressive relaxation exercises before an event helps a good deal too.

Was she panicked? Yes.  What do you do if this happens to you?  Breath.  STOP SPEAKING.  Do not try to TALK your way out of panic; never works.  Guess why?  The panic will distort your thoughts and words.  If you are on a train to Connecticut, but you want to go to New Jersey, do you continue on your journey thinking, “Well, eventually, I will land in New Jersey”?  Nope.  You get off the train, and get on another train.  If you are on the train to panics-ville, get off the train.  Stop speaking.  Take a sip of water.  Breath.  DO NOTHING. Clarify your thoughts.  Will it be a little awkward?  Yes.  Will it be better than speaking out of your arse (excuse my French)?  Much.

Would you like to know a dirty secret held by most public speaking coaches?  Ok here goes…. Everybody bombs.  Yep, it’s true.  Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Ole Abe Lincoln,  and occasionally a public speaking coach (not MOI of course :) ), everybody, everybody bombs.  Public speaking craft helps us reach a state of public speaking excellence, not public speaking perfection.  We are all human, and on occasion, we fail.  So what do you do if this happens to you?  Get up off your feet, dust yourself off, and then move on.   You failed, yes, but you are in good company, and you have faced the worst.  You need not fear the podium again.

What do you think?  Under-prepared, or panicked?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications.  He is a public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in Manhattan.

Passion and Public Speaking

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

Laurie Santos, head of the Comparative Cognition Lab at Yale University, gives a great speech here on the roots of human irrationality. The study itself is inspired and creative (she compares human economic behavior to monkey behavior), so a lot of the work for the speech has been done before she steps on stage. That being said, I think Ms. Santos excels at conveying passion and enthusiasm for her subject. I can hear you now: “But Jeff, that can’t be taught”. Au Contraire, yes it can. It’s quite simple if you follow an important guideline: Only speak about topics you enjoy speaking about, and add interest to a speech (quotes, stories, comparisons, contrasts) when your subject is boring you. Ambivalence about your topic is to be avoided at all costs. In this speech, Ms. Santos uses a great quote from Hamlet to humorous effect, and adds interest to an already engrossing topic.

There are two other things Ms. Santos does well; she does not over rely on her Power Point presentation, and she ends her speech on a positive note. Going negative is the cardinal sin of public speaking technique, and she avoids it well, coming to a nice, definitive conclusion.

If I were to quibble a bit with her technique, I would suggest that she could slow down, and breathe more. There are moments when she appears to be a little out of breath. Slowing down, and deliberately breathing more will help her calm her nerves, and will allow the audience to catch up with her ideas.

Overall, however, I consider this a job well done.

Your thoughts?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is an executive public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City. (more…)

Analysis of TED’s WikiLeaks Q and A

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Let’s take a look at TED’s WikiLeaks Q and A from a public speaking standpoint. What steps are necessary in order to successfully navigate a Q and A session? Listening to the question is essential, as is defining terms, giving your opinion when asked, backing up your opinion with facts, and acknowledging what you don’t know. Given that 80% of our impression of a speaker has to do with their non-verbal communication, open gestures, alignment, and a resonant voice matter a great deal too.

With these points in mind, how successful was this Q and A? My first thought was “My God what is up with the cell phones?!” Julian Assange’s phone goes off at 1:53, in the middle of the Q and A, and he has to turn it off in front of the audience. Ladies and Gentlemen, this is not a good start to a Q and A. Uttering “God Damn” afterward did not help his case. The interviewer did a nice job of staying in the moment, and makes a quip which helps alleviate the situation. So no biggie, things happen in a speech.

But wait a minute, hold on, is that the interviewer holding a cell phone and using it like a conductor would a baton throughout the interview?? Why, yes it is! It seems that both interviewer and interviewee are so obsessed with their electronic gadgets that they can’t part with them for any reason, even when they are on television.

Non-verbal analysis aside, the content of the Q and A fares better. Mr. Assange defends Wiki Leaks in a cogent manner, and has details and facts to back himself up. The interviewer does a fair job of asking the tough questions of this controversial guest, when he’s not waving his cell phone around in the air.

I think Mr. Assange’s most impressive moment comes at the end of the Q and A when he is asked about what motivates his work. He says: “Capable, generous men do not create victims, they nurture victims”. Obviously Mr. Assagne had anticipated he might be asked this question, and he prepared an answer, one that is thoughtful and illuminating.

What do you think of the Q and A?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is an executive public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City.

Sir Ken Robinson and the Art of the Thesis Statement

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Sir Ken Robinson gives a wonderful and hilarious speech on the need for education reform. He has a delivery to die for, and a comedian’s timing, which can’t be taught. What can be taught is how to say something with your speech. Here the thrust is crystal clear; the educational system kills creativity rather than nurturing it, and it’s time for reform. From this profound and bold statement, we get a myriad of wonderful personal stories, quips, and jokes. My personal favorite is his bit about what it must have been like to teach Shakespeare. What’s your favorite part of the speech?

Jeffrey Davis is the owner of Speak Clear Communications. He is an executive public speaking coach and accent reduction coach in New York City.