Archive for the ‘Video Analysis of Contemporary Speeches’ Category

Great Speech, Poor Nonverbal Communication

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

Ric Elias gives a nearly great speech here, he has a strong attention-getter, a lot of wonderful stories, and a strong call to action, but, unfortunately, that work is undercut by lackluster non-verbal communication; a downward vocal inflection style (especially toward the end of the speech), and uninspired movement.

Ric starts with a rousing attention-getter, he tells the audience about the sensory experience of being on the plane that crashed in the Hudson River.  There are many great details here, the sound of “no sound” as the plane’s engines are cut, the look of terror in the eyes of a stewardess, the thoughts that flashed through his mind as he braces for impact.  There is also an excellent call to action at the end of the speech, a detail that many speakers leave out.  All speeches should strive to create some change in the audience and here Ric challenges the audience to imagine as if they had only moments to live, and to think about what they might change.    This is wonderfully creative.

But, alas, Ric appears a little bit out-of-gas.  He shuffles somewhat listlessly, and gestures without much intention.  He allows his pitch to descend at the end of some sentences.

If you are feeling a little lethargic before a speech, try something simple…like push-ups!  Sound crazy?  It’s not.  Even a few push ups will get the blood flowing, and perhaps enliven your body.  If you have a downward inflection style, work with a coach or colleague on your presentation and make sure to lift the last syllable in each sentence.

Keep in mind 80% of our impression of a speaker is nonverbal!  If you feel your presentation style could use some work, give me a buzz, and let’s set up a free 20 minute consultation.

Q and A Technique and The Republican Presidential Debates

Friday, January 6th, 2012

Let’s look at the Republican presidential contenders from a public speaking perspective; how did they do as speakers during the debates?

As the video above shows, there was a wide variety of talent on display.  Politics aside, I think Gingrich is far and away the best speaker of the bunch.  Gary Johnson had perhaps the best punch line of the debates (“My next door neighbor’s two dogs have created more shovel ready jobs than the current administration.”), but Gingrich can pull together stories, quotes, statistics, comparisons and contrasts effortlessly, and convey his point with conviction with almost every question he answers.  Herman Cain, on the other hand, was often vague during the debates, offering up platitudes instead of meaningful details.

In the video above, watch the way Gingrich uses the Carter administration as a metaphor for the current administration, and slips in a witty, sly quote from Ronald Reagan to make his point about the need for reform.

Say what you will about him politically (full disclosure, his politics aren’t mine), but Newt Gingrich is perhaps one of the world’s best debaters.

Speak Clear Client Elizabeth Schofield’s TED Speech

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

Elizabeth worked very hard on this speech, and she executed it flawlessly.  Notice the ease with which she moves, how she takes her time with the language, how she tells stories to illuminate her point, and, finally, her dynamic call to action.  Excellent stuff.

What to Do if your Presentation Lacks Power

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011


I have mixed thoughts about Graham Hill’s TED speech.

He has a nice attention-getter; he utilizes a prop to make a point about how often we move from place to place, and the amount of things that we drag along.  He has a simple premise; simplify, and some very nice examples. He uses PowerPoint very well, utilizing simple, entertaining images to drive his premise, and he does not clutter his slides with data.

But I’m still a little underwhelmed.  And that’s because we’ve heard this speech before.  It’s important to really sweat out what your premise is when you begin a speech.  Once you’ve decided what you would like to do with the speech, whether it is to entertain, persuade, or educate, it’s crucial that you look for something novel or new to say with your speech.  Unfortunately, we’ve heard many times before that we all ought to simplify our space, simplify our lives.  There is nothing terribly novel about Mr. Hill’s speech, so it lacks power.

What might have helped?  A new approach.  Ok simplifying living spaces is your passion… how about discussing the concept of simplicity itself a bit more?  Or delving a bit into why we clutter?  Or connecting a personal story of your own to why you truly like to simplify?  Personalizing a speech always creates more interest.

Yes, sometimes it’s good to go with your first instinct with a speech…but often, we need to sit with our premise for a long time, in order to reap its rewards.

Rex Ryan and Speaking Passionately

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

What makes a good planned speech?  Structure, yes, but a speech needs feeling as well.  Too often presentations lack fire, emotion, feeling.  Ok so maybe you’re talking about your firm’s software, and not about famine, or war, or politics, but there are still opportunities to connect your values to your speech, and to let your passion show.

I like Rex Ryan’s speech here.  The tone is rude, and tough as nails, but given his environment, that makes perfect sense.  He doesn’t have a lot of structure to what he is doing, but he does the most important things well; he makes eye contact, and he speaks from his heart.

Experiment with going off-script.  This doesn’t mean you wing your presentations, or swear like a sailor like Rex Ryan does.  Bad idea.  It just means you learn to keep it loose and follow your train of thoughts and feelings first, and your notes second.

How to Execute a Killer Twenty Minute Speech

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

JJ Abrams gives a killer twenty minute speech here.

How? Simple.  First, NO POWERPOINT.  Break the addiction folks, powerpoint is often way overused.  He uses video.. a more interesting choice

Second, he has a single, simple message… can you find it?  I think it is “mystery is more important than knowledge”.

Third, he tells loads of stories, and gives the speech a personal touch.  He begins right off the bat correlating his love for mystery with his love for his grandfather, and then tells touching stories about him.  There is always room to share; yes even in your business presentations.

Fourth, the power of three; he has a strong premise, discussion section, and conclusion.  We all like threes… so tell them what your gonna tell them, tell them, and then tell them what you told them.

Fifth, he’s got cool props.  Not slides, not graphs, not the dreaded hand-out, but props; the mystery box he bought as a kid, a deconstructed kleenex box, etc.  Props are powerful storytelling aids.

He stumbles a bit for wording at the top, and has some vocal tics, but who cares, as long as the passion and craft are there, an audience can accept imperfection.

Thoughts?

How to Execute a Killer Four Minute Speech

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

Killer four minute speech here.

Watch the way Marc Besos uses storytelling to enliven his speech.  What makes his storytelling so perfect, and worthy of the standing ovation it receives, is its brevity and wit. Mr. Besos weaves his story effortlessly into his main point; that small acts of courage matter as much as big acts of courage.

It also helps that Marc knows his material well, that he is not working too hard to be funny, and that he is comfortable in his body.

How do you weave storytelling into your speeches, or your presentations?

Video Analysis of One of the World’s Best Public Speakers

Friday, February 4th, 2011

Sir Ken Robinson is hands down one of the world’s greatest speakers.  I defy you not to be immensely entertained and enlightened by this twenty minute speech.

Almost every moment here is a gem.  Let’s start with his body language.  Notice how still he is.  Of course, one should feel free to move throughout a speech, there are no hard and fast rules about body language, but few among us have the tolerance to explore stillness while speaking the way Sir Robinson does.

Now let’s take a look at his language…every word is articulated clearly, and he uses an abundance of inflection and pitch.  He hits his content words, and makes every point clear, yet never over-articulates.  Because he is physically relaxed, we are not distracted by his gestures from the most important component of his speech, his ideas.

He uses his wit to wonderful effect in this speech, eliciting a laugh a minute.  Every trick in the public speaking book is used here, analogies, stories, quotes (including a gem from Abraham Lincoln), one-liners…. the speech is crammed with interest.  It’s no wonder his last TED speech was downloaded over 10 million times!

Notice the structure of the beginning of his speech; an attention getter at the top that elicits a big laugh, then a clear thesis statement outlying his topic, than a wonderful analogy is made playing off of the public’s fascination with “resources”.  Now we are hooked, and we know where we are going.  The discussion section of the speech is a series of short, pithy stories.  The story he tells about the child who wants to be a fireman, and is humiliated for not wanting to go to college, is one of the best, most appropriate, and powerfully told stories I have ever heard.  Watch when he polls the audience as to who is wearing wristwatches… he manages to make a point, and leave everybody in stitches at the same time.

I could go on, and on.  Each brilliantly told story weaves effortlessly into his main point: education is in need of reform.  He culminates with a lovely quote from W.B Yeats.

A colleague of mine once said to me; “You know a standing ovation is authentic if the audience stands as one unit, immediately after the speech has finished”.  Sir Robinson’s authentic ovation here was well deserved.

Obama’s Tucson Speech

Friday, January 14th, 2011

President Obama gives a powerful, and eloquent speech at the memorial in Tucson for the victims of Saturday’s shooting spree in Arizona.

To begin with, he has made the smart choice to work without a tele-prompter, and instead, simply read off of cards.  This allows him to make an abundance of eye contact, and to focus more readily on the ideas behind the speech.

He starts the speech with a jarring attention getter, speaking of the “sudden hole torn in our hearts”.  The image suggests a bullet wound.  It’s a bold metaphor, and a great choice for an opener.  From here, he moves into the stories of sacrifice and courage under fire that permeated the tragedy.  A great speech is always filled with personal details, and there is an abundance here; the r.v. used by two victims to travel across the country, or the fact that the youngest victim, a 9 year old girl, was a softball player, and dreamed of being the first woman in Major League Baseball.

Obama never forgets his call to action.  Every speech should have one.  Toward the conclusion of the speech, Obama states: “we know we should not use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on each other.”  It’s a profound plea for peace, made in a speech that was defined by chaos.

What do you think?  I would rate this as one of our president’s finer moments.

Personal Reveleation and Public Speaking

Monday, December 13th, 2010

How much should you reveal in a speech?  Should you put yourself on the line?  Tell something private about yourself?  In this speech, Tony Porter uses a number of deeply personal stories to drive home his point about the socialization of men.  His thesis is stated early, and is crystal clear; men are taught to hide their emotions, and disrespect women, and this needs to change.

Many speakers would resort to dry statistics in order to prove their point, but Mr. Porter makes a much shrewder choice by using deeply personal stories.  He begins with a story about his children, and his overbearing need to discipline his son because he is crying.  He moves on to a story about his father crying in a limousine after a funeral, and then a story about his first sexual experience.  Each story builds in intensity and personal revelation, and weaves effortlessly into his thesis.  The effect is very powerful.

Statistics help build a case in a speech, but they are not the lifeblood a good speech.  Good stories are at the heart of a good speech, and the more personal, the better.  Ultimately, the audience wants to connect on a human level to a speaker, and deeply felt stories help build this intimacy.

So what do you think?  Are you willing to tell a secret in a speech?